US, war and climate change Without adaptation, Zimbabwe’s rain-dependent agricultural yield could drop by 50 percent, affecting millions of smallholder farmers, 70 percent of whom are women

Sara Flounders Correspondent
The US military machine is the world’s biggest institutional consumer of petroleum products and the world’s worst polluter of greenhouse gas emissions. The role of the US military is not on the agenda of the Paris COP21 Climate Conference. There is an elephant in the climate debate that by US demand cannot be discussed or even seen. This agreement to ignore

the elephant is now the accepted basis of all international negotiations on climate change.

It is well understood by every possible measurement that the Pentagon, the US military machine, is the world’s biggest institutional consumer of petroleum products and the world’s worst polluter of greenhouse gas emissions and many other toxic pollutants. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket exemption in all international climate agreements.

Ever since the Kyoto Accords or Kyoto Protocol negotiations in 1998, in an effort to gain US compliance, all US military operations worldwide and within the US are exempt from measurement or agreements on reduction. The US Congress passed an explicit provision guaranteeing US military exemptions. (Interpress Service, May 20, 1998)

The complete US military exemption from greenhouse gas emissions calculations includes more than 1 000 US bases in more than 130 countries around the world, its 6 000 facilities in the US, its aircraft carriers and jet aircraft. Also excluded are its weapons testing and all multilateral operations such as the giant US commanded NATO military alliance and AFRICOM, the US military alliance now blanketing Africa. The provision also exempts US/UN-sanctioned activities of “peacekeeping” and “humanitarian relief”.

After gaining this giant concession the US government still refused to sign the Kyoto Accord, thus sabotaging years of international effort at an agreement.

The provisions of the Kyoto Protocol nevertheless became the basis of all future proposed international meetings on a climate treaty, including Copenhagen 2009, Cancun 2010, Durban 2011, Doha 2012 and the United Nations ongoing 21st Conference of the Parties on Climate Change meeting in Paris in 2015.

In all past international conferences it was again and again the US government that sabotaged the meetings and refused to be bound by any treaty. The Obama Administration on August 27 again confirmed that at the UN meeting in New York in September to prepare for the 2015 Paris meeting that only a non-binding agreement could be put forward.

Unless the climate activists at the grassroots level challenge this exemption of the US military and begins to focus a laser light on the most dangerous source of global warming and climate change, the movement will become lost in vague generalities, utopian hopes and toothless accords.

Exposing the horrendous social costs of US militarism must be part of the challenge. Washington’s military role acts to constantly reinforce at every level the repressive state apparatus.

For decades, and at an accelerated pace since 2001, the military has provided an endless stream of free war equipment to local city and state police, National Guard units and sheriffs’ offices. Youth of oppressed nations within the US become targets of a vastly expanded police state. The fresh images of tanks and armoured police in Ferguson confirmed for millions the results of this racist policy.

Exposing the devastation of US wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya is essential. These US wars have contaminated the soil and water of vast regions under US occupation with depleted uranium, benzene and trichloroethylene from air base operations and Perchlorate, a toxic ingredient in rocket propellant. More than 1 000 military sites in the US are filled with these toxins, topping the Superfund list of contaminated sites. The poorest communities, especially communities of colour, are the most severely impacted by this continuing military poisoning.

It is essential to connect the Pentagon exemption from international negotiations to its primary role as the protector and expander of corporate power on a global scale. The most powerful and profitable corporations are the oil and military corporations; these are the other primary polluters.

Unlike the climate change deniers, the Pentagon’s own published studies confirm the danger to the planet. But US officer corps is committed to what they call full spectrum dominance. So every study of climate change by the military planners is based on evaluating how to take advantage of the future crisis to more firmly entrench US corporate power and protect the irrational capitalist system that has created this crisis.

The Pentagon studies are not on plans to deliver emergency aid in the face of climate disasters such as floods, droughts, famines, epidemics, typhoons, tornadoes, hurricanes, ice storms, water shortages and damage to infrastructure. Their war colleges and think tanks’ plans are on how to extract political concessions on docking rights and future military access during a besieged country’s hour of greatest emergency need.

The 2014 Defence Department’s Quadrennial Defence Review describes the threat of climate change as “a very serious national security vulnerability”. This QRD discusses how to maintain global US military hegemony in the face of ever worsening global climate disruptions.

The military officer caste is focused on maintaining Wall Street rule and capitalist property relations during a crisis. There is concern with preserving the authority of their puppets, allies and collaborators.

“Climate change poses another significant challenge for the United States and the world at large. As greenhouse gas emissions increase, sea levels are rising, average global temperatures are increasing, and severe weather patterns are accelerating.”

“The impacts of climate change may increase the frequency, scale, and complexity of future missions, including defence support to civil authorities… The Department’s operational readiness hinges on unimpeded access to land, air, and sea training…”

Military and corporate planning is callously focused on how to take advantage of the life-threatening changes. A most frightening example is the National Strategy for the Arctic Region. This White House Report opens by praising the Arctic as “an amazing place”. But then quickly defines the need for focusing on strategic priorities to meet the challenges and opportunities ahead.

The essence of the report is that the melting of the polar ice cap and the “new Arctic environment” means “ocean resources are more readily accessible as sea ice diminishes”. This is an opportunity to access the vast untapped oil, gas and mineral resources and increase the flow of fossil fuels — big profits for big oil.

In 2014 Defence the Centre for Naval Analysis issued a study titled: “National Security and the Accelerating Risks of Climate Change.” This report, a follow-up report to their 2007 report, prepared by 11 retired generals and admirals sees climate change as the source of international instability and the greatest threat to the established capitalist order.

This study is not on how to use the enormous technological ability of the US military machine to provide solutions or emergency assistance. Everything is posed in terms of national security in the face of alleged potential terror threats.

Based on these reports and on the US role in every climate meeting in over 20 years, it is clear that US corporate power and the monstrous military machine it has funded must become a focus of class-conscious climate activists. This would contribute greatly to an understanding of the source and the real solutions to this global crisis. – Global Research.

You Might Also Like