Zimpapers Logo

Liesl Louw-Vaudran Correspondent—

The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) has been fighting for independence of the territory for decades, and the report is in line with a July 2017 decision by AU heads of state.

But why is this report so significant? After all, the AU has been debating this question for years, especially in the run-up to Morocco’s adhesion to the organisation in January 2017.

The discussion of the report by heads of state will in fact be the first time the AU gets directly involved in this crisis, whereas before, it merely denounced Morocco’s “colonial occupation” of the territory.

The release of the report in Nouakchott also comes at a crucial juncture where the international community – particularly the United States – is showing increasing impatience to solve one of Africa’s most long-standing conflicts.

Last month, the US sponsored a United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution that limits the mandate of the UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) to six months instead of the habitual one year.

MINURSO has been keeping the peace between Morocco and the Polisario Front, the political arm of the SADR, for 27 years. And there are no indications that this referendum will ever take place – certainly not if Morocco can help it.

While there is increasing pressure on the actors and on UN mediator Horst Köhler to find a negotiated solution, both sides are arguing their case with increased vigour.

The SADR wants independence and Morocco stands firm on its offer to give the Sahrawi a large measure of autonomy under the Moroccan flag.

Morocco also wants the role of Algeria in supporting the SADR taken into account in any talks about Western Sahara.

Last month, SADR president Brahim Ghali scored political points in Southern Africa by visiting several countries in the region, including Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho, South Africa and Zimbabwe, his second trip to the region in just over a year.

He was warmly welcomed by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, who was in fact expected to put such bilateral disputes on the back-burner as he tries to build economic ties on the continent.

Supporters of Western Sahara in South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) continue to lobby for the independence of the territory from Morocco. One of the outcomes of this lobbying has been South Africa’s decision not to support Morocco’s bid to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Scathing anti-Moroccan pronouncements by some ordinary South Africans on social media accompanied this decision.

The SADR also clinched a victory against Morocco through the detention of a shipment of phosphate in Algoa Bay last year.

South African courts accepted that the 55 000 tonnes of phosphate were illegally mined in Western Sahara, which is internationally classified as a non-self-governing territory. They ordered that the multimillion-dollar shipment belongs to the Polisario Front to dispose of as it wishes.

But despite such visible Southern African support for the SADR, Morocco has also made inroads in lobbying for a negotiated settlement. It seems to have eased off on its unpopular policy of boycotting or disrupting any international meetings where delegations from the SADR were present.

These disruptions didn’t sit well with AU member states, who after all accepted to have Morocco as the AU’s 55th member state last year.

The country also seems to have put on the back-burner any campaigns for the expulsion of the SADR from the AU.

Morocco is also devoting time and energy to its work in the AU.

In January this year, the country was elected a member of the AU Peace and Security Council (PSC) and has since vigorously pursued dialogue with other member states, civil society and experts on ways to strengthen the PSC.

Morocco’s attempts to reform the PSC are strengthened by the fact that most of the 15 members on the current PSC do not recognise the SADR.

Faki’s report is expected to take into account all these developments in the region and will be wary of antagonising Morocco – something that could have dire consequences. Moroccans have historically been united in the opinion that “the Sahara” belongs to them, and whenever high-ranking officials question this, street protests and counter-measures have ensued. – Reproduced from ISSAfrica.org